Sunday, December 20
Pink
Wednesday, December 16
Diapers
Monday, December 14
Chart
Friday, December 11
Terror
Thursday, December 10
Puking Chart
A "puke" is defined as any trip to the toilet (or other puke receptacle as available) in which heaving is accomplished, without regard to the presence of actual vomitus. After successive "pukes" throughout a single day, they tend to degenerate into dry heaves, but are tallied for this chart anyway. This is not a count of heaving events, which would be at least equal to, but in fact much greater than the number of pukes; heaving events generally occur 2 to 5 times per puke.
Analysis:
Hyperemesis gravidarum is certainly a complicated issue and a full study of all related factors will not be done at this time. It would require much more data than is being collected with regards to diet, hydration therapy, weight, time of day, etc. One interesting fact is this: the embryo hates St. George. The red boxes below enclose days that Shannon has been in SLC.
Since the 20th of November, Shannon pukes 5.6 times per day on days that she is not in SLC, and only 0.2 times per day on days that she is in SLC.
Monday, December 7
Announcement
Sunday, December 6
Absenteeism
Wednesday, November 11
Leftovers
Tuesday, November 10
Planning our family vacations
Monday, November 9
Gizmo
Tuesday, November 3
Change
Monday, November 2
Hair Removal
Sunday, November 1
TROGDOR!!!!!
Saturday, October 31
Things that must go
Tuesday, October 27
Elements
1: Hydrogen - I've collected H2 gas off of a reaction using HCl, and also ignited H2-filled soap bubbles.
2: Helium - Does inhaling it from balloons count? Even if it didn't, I've put it through a diffraction grating and looked at it spectral lines. That one experiment from physics 107/150 is going to get me a whole handful of these.
3: Carbon - A whole semester of organic chemistry lab. Ewwww.
4: Nitrogen - Liquid nitrogen, for everything from shattering pennies, to making ice cream, to hammering rubber hoses into a 2x4, to actual productive purposes.
5: Oxygen - I've collected it out of the atmosphere as a liquid. Liquid O2 is very exciting. (And potentially very dangerous. I've never had more than a few mL of it.)
6: Fluorine - I use HF at work all the time. The first on this list that I haven't encountered in elemental form.
7: Sodium - It burns yellow. (Like the sun.) I've only burned it in solution though. Elemental sodium is quite dangerous.
8: Magnesium - Burns extremely bright white. It's what they use in fireworks, and it's fun to play around with strips of it. As a side note, water catalyzes it's oxidation, so be very careful how you fight a magnesium fire.
9: Aluminum - Drinking a can of Coke does not fill this requirement. But writing a senior thesis about microscopy of aluminum oxide does.
10: Silicon - More microscopy. And hours spent wedging it down until it is 0.000004 inches thick.
11: Phosphorus, 12: Sulfur, 13: Chlorine: As it turns out, a mixture of these 3 elements (as H3PO4, H2SO4 and HCl) will put holes in your pants quite nicely. Not quite the experiment that I was supposed to be doing, but it's the one that I remember.
14: Argon - this is what we use for an inert atmosphere at work.
15: Calcium - I've dissolved calcium carbonate in acid. Sounds exciting, but it's just limestone.
16: Iron - Well, who hasn't done something with iron?
17: Cobalt - The aluminum oxide I mentioned earlier, well, it was covered in cobalt.
18: Copper - Pennies aren't just for spending, they're also good to turn into brass.
19: Zinc - You take the old penny, disolve some zinc in acid, and, um . . . I forget the rest of the lab, but it ends up with a brass penny.
20: Gallium - it melts near room temperature, so it makes a nice phase transition lab for pre-med students. It also super cools pretty well, unless the surface of your sample is too oxidized, then it just won't re-solidify. And I use it at work all the time.
21: Germanium - I know thee well.
22: Zirconium - Used a strip of it as a heating element once upon a time. It had just the right resistivity.
23: Molybdenum - Hard to spell, and boring to measure the resistivity of a wire made of it! By this point in the periodic table, I'm now skipping the majority of the elements.
24: Indium - I've soldered with it to make electrical contacts.
25: Tin - Also used in soldering.
26: Cesium - I've measured the half-life of a radio active isotope.
27: Tungsten - My wedding ring is made of tungsten carbide. It doesn't scratch. I've tried. Yeah, it's a bit weak, but I'm counting this one.
28: Silver - I have deposited a film of silver onto glass to make my own mirror, which was then used in an experiment to measure the speed of light through different mediums. The experiement was a big failure, but it wasn't the mirror's fault.
29: Mercury - I've studied the spectral lines.
30: Lead - I've measured the half-thickness for stopping the radiation from the aforementioned Cesium isotope.
And, from here on out, pretty much everything is radioactive. There is one other radioactive isotope that I have worked with, but I can't remember what it was. Possibly it was a repeat, but I don't think it was. So, at this point, I can point to 30 elements I've used. There's probably another 1-3 that I have used, but I'm not remembering it at the moment.
Wednesday, October 21
Prognostications
Monday, October 12
Blog Comments
So, lets analyze this hypothetical post. There are various things I agree with: Obama won the peace prize, and he hasn't achieved any meaningful peace, in my opinion. Then there are some things that I don't necessarily agree with, but that I can at least respect as a plausible opinion: America might be less safe now than when Obama took office, because of his policies. Then (and it always seems to be at the end) the post says something downright silly: that Obama is stupid. Say what you will, the man isn't dumb. He holds degrees from Columbia and Harvard.
So now we're down to my dilema as a blog reader. Someone I know has just written this silly statement that Obama is dumb. My first reaction upon reading is to write up a snarky comment pointing out to them that while they may not like Obama, they should stick to actual criticism, rather than illogical logorrhea. I usually get most of the way through the comment when I start to think about how the author will react. Because it's the internet, whatever I type will come out sounding argumentative and condescending (I think the internet does that to whatever you type, whether you mean it or not) and they will get defensive. Arguments will ensue, and now I've just taken a friend and created a whole bunch of bad karma. And the worst part is, I agreed with most of what they said! So, in the end I wind up not commenting at all. And they never know of their silliness, and they get no comments on their blogs.
So dear reader(s), what am I to do? Do I sustain my "keep the peace" policy? (Can I get a Nobel Prize for that?) Or do I try to politely point out that they are dead wrong on a topic and risk the ensuing melee? Some of my friends have some pretty strong opinions, and, while I know I do too, I try to remember that there are more important things than convincing other people that I'm right all the time. (Because I am, and deep down inside, you all know it.)
So, time for you to comment about commenting on friends blogs when you disagree with them. By all means, go ahead and disagree with me. :)
Sunday, September 20
Cluck
Sunday, September 13
Stats
- 0: Zero punts. On 10 offensive possessions BYU had 2 field goals, 6 touchdowns, an interception and a turn over on downs. That's pretty efficient football. (Of course, that took our best kicker out of the game, it seems. For the second game in a row, we had a kickoff out of bounds (how hard it is to keep it in bounds? the field is like 30 yards wide) and Payne missed a PAT.)
- 6/9: Third down conversions. 67% is pretty darn good, but that isn't really the number that piqued my interest. The interesting number: 9. BYU only had 9 3rd downs all game long. 79 plays in the game and all but 67 of them were either 1st or 2nd down. It's a good thing when your offense doesn't need 3 tries to get a first down.
- 16: Players that gained yardage for BYU. Sure, it helps that it was a blowout and everyone got in on the action, but on 26 completions no one caught more than 4 balls, and 45 runs were split up between 10 players with no one getting more than 12 carries. 9 players averaged 3.5 yards per carry or more.
Monday, September 7
Eruptions
Sunday, September 6
Wow. It's been 12 hours, and it's still sinking in. BYU beat #3 Oklahoma on a not-quite-neutral field. Wow.
- BYUs defense was the best unit on the field througout pretty much the entire game. Better than either offense, and better than OUs defense.
- Replacing 4 offensive linemen, having a top offensive player out with an injury and losing another important player to injury in the first half might might be a decent excuse for losing a game. But it's real hard to make that arguement when it applies to both teams. There simply isn't any ground to say that any one play was the game breaker. OU lost their starting QB. BYU turned the ball over 4 times. (The muffed punt was particularly eggregious.) Both teams got called for pass interference in the endzone. (The call against BYU was pretty iffy in my opinion.) Both teams picked up lots of penalties and did it in bad spots on occasion. (OU kept putting themselves in 3rd and long situations from their O-line, and BYU essentially put OUs final drive together for them with a kick out of bounds, a face mask and a late hit (if I remember that correctly)). In short, it looked like the first game of the season.
- I found it particularly interesting that in the second half both teams moved the ball down to about the 5 yard line, ran a few plays, got a PI call in the end zone, started fresh at the 2 yard line, and then was called for a false start. BYU got a touchdown, OU didn't.
- The final BYU drive of 16 plays, 78 yards and 8:44 was really impressive. I was most worried for our chances at the opening kickoff, and then again near the end of the 3rd quarter. In the 3rd quarter the OU O-line and D-line seemed to be wearing down BYU, which happens so often in big games. I feared BYU would run out of gas and a bigger, faster and more talented OU team would finally push by them and win pulling away. Instead, BYU ate up most of the 4th quarter on a great drive.
- Speaking of drives, OUs 3 longest drives were 52, 43 and 35 yards. BYU put together drives of 78, 63 and 59 yards.
Thursday, September 3
Football
Wednesday, September 2
Total Eclipse. Literally.
The idea here is that what you are seeing in music videos doesn't always correlate well with the lyrics. So, people have been creating 'literal versions' of music videos, where the lyrics have been adjusted to represent whatever you're watching. There are a whole lot of them on youtube, with a wide range of quality. The vocal talents of the re-recordings are severely lacking on some of the videos, and obviously some videos are better suited to the project to begin with. But here is the best one that I'm aware of out there. The lyrics are on the screen so you can sing along! Well, without futher ado (thanks for laboring through all that ado!) I present the literal version of Total Eclipse of the Heart.
Sunday, August 30
Feast for Two
Saturday, August 29
Zion
Friday, August 28
Fake Numbers
Now, you might be thinking that his point isn't the exact number of hours it takes to master something, he's just driving at the idea that it takes a long time. Well, if that were his point, he should have said, "it takes a long time". Or "it takes years and years". But the one thing I'm almost certain of is that it doesn't take 10,000 hours to become an expert. And when you think about it, you know that number can't really be calculated the way it should be, unless Gladwell managed to somehow measure how much time Bill Gates spent working on computers decades ago, or how many hours John Lennon spent fiddling with his guitar and writing bad songs. In the end, what I think Gladwell did is determine that it takes a really long time to become an expert at something (surprise, surprise) and then picked a nice, round number that matched up with that.
Sunday, July 19
Re-Making it Worse
Saturday, July 18
Talking Julia
Sunday, June 28
Basketball
Thursday, June 18
Visitors
Monday, June 15
Sports Famine
Somewhere, Shannon is celebrating.
Tuesday, June 9
Hot Ham Water?
Monday, June 8
P
Saturday, May 16
Happy Anniversary
Wednesday, April 29
0-1
That, my friends, is what we call losing a meeting.
Monday, April 27
More books
Sunday, April 26
4 fluids
Tuesday, April 14
Her Parents Daughter
Friday, April 10
Updump
Friday, April 3
Boring tournament, Exciting math!
Brett started from a numerical approach, letting his computer set up 10,000 such tournaments, randomly placing the teams into brackets and seeing how it comes out, and intially supposed that team #2 has a 1/2 chance of 2nd place, #3 a 1/4 chance, #4 a 1/8 chance, and so on and so forth. The result isn't surprising. But quickly, we realized that this can't be correct. First off, it implies that all teams have a chance of winning, when they clearly don't. No team lower than the field size/2 + 1 can make the championship game. Also, that result can't be right because the probability of someone finishing in 2nd place only adds up to 1 if we sum forever, and we don't have infinitely many teams.
So, what is the probability? If you want to figure it out for yourself, quit reading now, because I'm about to tell you. Ok . . . I see that none of you have quit reading. (It's impressive that you've read this far.) After various attempts at finding a formula that fits, I present you with the formula for finding the probability of any team taking second place in such a tournament, generalized for any number of teams and any seed:
where f is the field size and s is the seed and a[s] represents the odds of the nth seed taking 2nd place, where 2 <> (f/2 +1). There, can't you rest easier this weekend now that this problem has been put to rest?
Wednesday, March 25
The Fix
You should read the whole post, it's not that long. But this is the gist presented in Q/A format, with me providing the questions, and Dr. Orzel responding:
Q: What's your plan?
A: "fire them. All of them. Every trader who bought or sold a mortgage-backed security, every manager who signed off on the buying and selling of credit default swaps, every CEO of every company now in need of a federal bailout, everybody who ever shook hands with Bernie Madoff."
Q: And who should we hire to run things?
A: "I've thought of the perfect replacements: physicists."
Q: But won't physicists screw it up because they don't know about business and economics?
A: "the people who are pushing that line the hardest are the people who stand to benefit most from large windfall payments to the current financial industry. Which is to say, the people who have wrecked the economy by failing to understand the most basic facts of the underlying market. They have lots of experience, to be sure, but the bulk of their experience is in being wrong about everything. They lost billions to a Ponzi scheme, for God's sake. And, seriously, do you really think that these transactions are too complicated for physicists to figure out? We're talking about people who have spent the last several years thinking about folding and twisting strings in eleven dimensions."
Monday, March 23
Eragon and Eldest
Unfortunately, it turns out there will be 4 books, not 3. Hopefully he writes #4 quickly, because I am not reading the first 3 over (again) before reading #4.
Anyway, if you haven't read Eragon, here is my fairly spoiler-laden review:
Eragon was written by a kid. He was like 15 when he started the book, perhaps 17 by the time he finished. Google it if you really want to know. It is very impressive that any teenager can write a coherant book. The best way I can describe the book is that I think he watched the original Star Wars trilogy, read Lord of the Rings and then thought: "Hey, I have a fabulous idea for a book!"
We have Eragon, an orphaned child living with his uncle. He doesn't even know who his father is, and his mother dropped him off as a baby and was never heard from again. He ends up coming across a dragon egg which hatches for him, and names the dragon Saphira. Some bad guys who work for the evil king come looking for him, and he ends up leaving his backwater village with kinda crazy old guy who lives nearby, pretending to be a story teller. But, as it turns out!, kinda crazy old guy isn't who he appears to be! He's been hiding that in the past he was a feared warrior with magical powers who happens to be nearby and can now teach Eragon to use his magical powers! The book is largely a travelogue of their adventures as they get captured, escape, kill some bad guys, learn about Eragon's destiny, and eventually make their way to the small alliance of rebels. Sadly, this group isn't known as the Rebel Alliance, but as the Varden. Along their way, we see that their world is made up of humans, elves (who have magical powers and live forever, but like to keep to themselves in their forest), dwarves (who are excellent miners and live in the mountains) and urgals (who are disgusting, horned brutes who work for the bad guy).
Really, the book isn't bad, though I do like to poke fun at it. It is entertaining and goes quickly. It's not great literature, but it is a good distraction from life, and is better for you than watching reruns of 'Friends'.
The second book in the series is Eldest. Begin spoiler fest:
Having defeated the urgal army at the end of the first book, Eragon travels to the elves' forest to train where, lo and behold, a very old dragon rider and his dragon have been hiding for all these years waiting to train the next dragon rider (Eragon). We also discover that Eragon's travelling companion from the first book, Murtagh, who we thought died is really not dead, and has been put into the service of the evil king. Oh, and he's Eragon's brother. Oh, and their father was the evil king's right hand man before Brom (the kinda crazy storyteller who died in book 1) killed him. So, it's all one big happy family.
I'm currently half way through book 3, about 1500 pages into the adventure. While there aren't many surprises, it still sucks me in. (Just ask Shannon.)
Thursday, March 19
Yard Work
Wednesday, March 18
Made in America
Friday, March 13
Hold Still
I'm a Ben Folds fan, and apparently he's got some sort of contest going for people to sing acapella versions of his songs. There are some of the better ones on his website. (Remember, better and good have two separate and only loosely related meanings.) Watching some of them, I realized that acapella groups are:
1. Usually too big.
2. Incapable of holding still.
And it's rather distracting to watch 12 bodies wiggling, 20 guys trying to look cool, or this bevy of girls who, if you watch with the sound off, all seem to be playing on a Wii.
So please, if you're going to sing, hold still. It's not that hard. This guy does it four times!
One of these things . . .
Wednesday, March 11
Pasta Ridiculous
Sunday, March 8
Silly
Monday, March 2
Chrome
Sunday, March 1
Aggregation: It's anti-impressive
Thursday, February 26
Walking
Tuesday, February 24
Super Shopper
Sunday, February 22
New Calling
Extreme Sweeping
Thursday, February 19
Read me like an open Google
1. Clark likes to think that every year at the turn of midnight on his birthday, the whole world celebrates, everyone kissing everyone else and cheering. (This is actually very, very far from the truth.)
2. Clark likes to play his tuba. (I don't play the tuba, but I wouldn't mind learning.)
3. There are several insurance rating services, and the one Clark likes to suggest you use is A.M. Best. (I've sold out to corporate endorsement.)
4. Clark likes to keep fit through regular visits to the gym and has a passion for hiking and cross-country skiing.
5. Clark likes to emphasize that he's a poor Southern boy trapped in Los Angeles. (Wow! Google does know everything!)
6. Clark likes to delve into different worlds in her crackerjack novels of suspense; but while the milieus change, her stories are always . . . (remember folks, I have many milieus. You might say I have a plethora of milieus.)
7. And, as Clark likes to point out, everyone has ... (yes, my point exactly)
8. Clark likes to tinker with computer sounds and a capella renderings of drums. (also: a capella renderings of papers and coloring.)
9. And, as Clark likes to point out, everyone has health care. (Health care crisis solved! All it took was for me to point it out!)
10. Clark likes to use the term, "at the end of the day," as in "when we get to the bottom line," or "when it's all said and done,"
And, at the end of the day, that's what the internet thinks of me.
Tuesday, February 17
Wild Ride
Moral of the story: slow down, wear your seat belt, and if you're not going to do to that, at least do it somewhere that I won't have to spend a bunch of time sweeping up rocks from the parking lot!
Monday, February 16
Parade
You can see me
Friday, February 13
Empire
I'm catching up some of the books I've read lately.
Empire, by Orson Scott Card
Yeah, I read a lot of Card’s books. The premise behind this one is interesting, though. It’s set in the not too distant future in which some crazy people decide to over throw the government and start a revolution that is based on right vs left ideology. Now, before you start trying to guess who it is that ends up being the ‘bad guys’, I’ll remind you that Card, in addition to being LDS is also a registered Democrat. Basically, the book is about a big conspiracy theory which leads to shots being fired and rival governments being declared. While I’m not what I would call a big conspiracy theory sort of guy, that doesn’t keep the book from being entertaining, which is why I do most of my reading. I view the book like I would a Tom Clancy novel; it’s interesting and draws on various facts, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t a work of fiction. Card invents a presidency and all his characters, as well as other specifics.
Thursday, February 12
Killer Angels
Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara
I don’t know about you, but I can’t begin to count the times that I’ve read a book, and then, upon seeing the movie, felt disappointed because they left out so much detail and, often, plot. Well, if you’ve read Killer Angels and then seen the accompanying movie, Gettysburg, you won’t have any such feelings. You might be feeling a bit of de ja vu, however.
The 4 hour 15 minute movie and the 368 page book are so similar, at times I wondered if I was reading the script. The dialog is the same, often times word for word. I remarked to Shannon that the book is what you’d get if someone watching the movie were to describe it to you as they were watching, and they have a good vocabulary.
There are, of course, minor differences. The book has a few more maps that make it easier to understand the tactics of the whole situation, and the movie has a lot more explosions.
(I just found out the book was written in 1974. I hadn't figured it was that old.)
Made in Brazil
Here's the part where I remind you that I not only lived in Brazil for 2 years, but I lived in the part where this style of food comes from. The comparison I use is that me living in St. George and having been a few times to Famous Dave's Barbecue doesn't make me a good judge of authentic American barbecue. I'll leave that to people who have been to the South and experienced backyard slow cooked barbecue and been to the small, local barbecue restaurants. Same thing with the Brazilian food. Just because the meat is on a stick, doesn't make it authentic.
Authenticity:
Brazilian places like this don't really have a menu. You get the buffet of sides and they bring the meat to you, but they still have a small drink menu, which they gave us. And right at the top, it says something to the effect of "This is a churrascarria (pronounced "choo-ras-ka-REE-ah") . . . " Wrong! Right of the bat, they had two problems. First, it's spelled churrascaria, and secondly, it's pronounced "shoo-hahs-ka-REE-ah". But from there, things improved greatly. Guarana is a well known Brazilian soft drink, and they have two brands. Antartica is more familiar in the US, but they also have Brahma on tap. Brahma is evidently the second best selling guarana in Brazil and has a very different taste, but it's still good. Guarana is no more specific than "cola"; not all colas taste like Coke, and that's ok.
Churrascarias (a place where you get churrasco ("shoo-hahs-ko") which is the meat) always have a buffet. The point of the buffet is to trick you into eating less meat. A traditional churrasco will have a few sides. Some rice, some beans, a potato salad, tomatoes, bread, cucumbers and that's about it. But when churrascarias come to the US, they feel a need to fancify things up. So we end up with (last night) pickled potatoes, crab salad, broccoli salad, green olives and a variety of other things offered. I don't mind them adding these things, but I don't eat them, because I'm going for an authentic meal. Made in Brazil did have a nice selection of more authentic foods, which included: fried yucca (excellent!), fried bananas, fried rice balls, rice, beans, stroganoff, and farofa (yucca flour).
The meat was good. It wasn't perhaps as salty as I would have liked, but it was still good. They had a good variety (which is smaller if you go for lunch, but lunch is cheaper) including chicken hearts (which they cooked just for me), grilled pinapple (I realize this isn't a meat), sirloin, chicken wrapped in bacon, and other yummy things. Shannon even tried a small piece of chicken heart. You'll have to ask her about it.
Service:
I thought the service was excellent. They were friendly, but more importantly, the people the brought the meat around remembered what we wanted. When we mentioned to one that I was waiting for some chicken hearts, he even told the other guy. Interestingly, one employee came and started talking to me in Portuguese. I asked if he always assumed people spoke Portuguese, and he told me he could tell that I did based on what I was eating.
Ambiance:
Nice. It wasn't at capacity, which helps, but I liked it. It was clean, etc.
Price:
Churrasco is never cheap, as it focuses on meat which is brought to your table and cut just for you. But the price is reasonable for a churrascaria. I think the dinner is 18 bucks. Lunch is less (15ish?). We won't be going back often, but birthdays only come back once a year.
In Conclusion:
I'd go back often, except for the price. This is why we don't eat out anywhere very often. I'd love to go again, and enjoy taking people and telling them all about the foods. So, if you want to hire me to spruce up your Churrascaria experience, I'm available.
Wednesday, February 11
Birthday
To catch up a bit: the picture in the previous post is indeed Joseph Stalin. Good ol' uncle Joe. Too bad anonymous chose to stay anonymous, so he doesn't win the prize. The prize instead goes to the second closest answer which would be KC and his guess of "Antonio Bandito" which, I'm pretty sure, is a childhood nickname for Stalin. I thought it was pretty interesting that communist leaders start out life looking very un-communist dictator-y. Not that this should really be surprising though.
Else where in life, I haven't been blogging much. I guess I'll have to work on that during my 28th trip around the sun. Today completes the 27th trip, at some time around 11:08pm. (What with all the leap years and other small adjustments it would be difficult to say exactly when this year's trip will conclude.) We are going to the new churrascaria in town to celebrate tonight, and at work, I got a gallon of chocolate milk as a gift! (Someone here at work apparently knows me well.)
Thursday, January 29
Awesome Hair
This guy's got it all going. The scarf, the scruff, and, most importantly, the hair. This is a guy who would be popular with the ladies. Maybe next time I go get my hair cut, I'll take this picture in so the hair dresser knows what I need.
But the real question is, who is this person? The picture is pretty old, as the image quality and clothing suggests, and subject is famous enough that I know everyone out there would know who he is if I told you. But telling you wouldn't be as much fun. So, time to guess: Who do you think this young rogue is?
Excel 2008
Today's angst is because I want to put lines on a graph. I just want to draw in some red lines. So I put one on and then decide to copy and paste it to duplicate it. But when I do, it pastes the line to the EXTREME left side of my graph, where I can't pick it up, because my mouse will only grab the edge of the graph. So, I am forced to go through the 7 or 8 extra mouse clicks for each line I want to get it to look the same, as the one I already have.
Add to this Excel's general inability to draw lines, and I'm just mad at is. I would draw the line not on the graph and then make copies and drag them onto the graph, but that isn't an option. Lines that aren't on graphs can't be vertical in Excel 2008. It won't let them. The ends of the line snap to invisible coordinates that force the line to be not vertical. And I can't drag my vertical line off the graph, because it just won't let me.
Oh, and if I copy my vertical line on the graph and paste it elsewhere, it comes out horizontal.
Can I please, please, PLEASE have Excel 2003 back?
Monday, January 26
Bug Book
I borrowed this book from my dad, which is about the only way you could probably even find it. Even amazon doesn't have a picture of it. The book was ok, but certainly not what I expected. I thought I'd find a story about people in their teens and twenties driving bugs around southern California in the 1960s. (Probably because these are the sorts of Bug stories I've heard from my dad.) Instead, the first third of the book focused on two guys with familiar last names, but who most people probably don't connect with the VW Beetle: Porsche and Hitler. It turns out that Hitler really wanted a car designed that every german family could own, and Porsche was the guy who really believed it was possible and designed the car. All back in the 1930s.
It's not a bad book, but unless you're really interested in VW Bugs, it's probably not going to be high on your list.
Sunday, January 25
Travelling
Last weekend we went to Tucson to visit Brett and Sabrina. We saw big cacti, and enjoyed some very warm weather. Brett put up some pictures of the trip. (Of course they focus on his family, not mine. I guess I haven't trained him properly.) We live in a neighborhood of cactus street names. We've got cholla, barrel, saguaro, and others. So we got to see the namesakes for our neighborhood. One more comment on saguaro cacti: I was expecting to see desert scapes with a lone giant cactus out in the distance. Instead, the hills in the area have thousands of cacti on them. They're everywhere.
Julia is growing, but at an ever slowing rate. In the last 6 months, she has moved from being bigger than average, to decidedly smaller than average. Shannon posts the details.
Corn Bran
For Christmas this year (and last year, too, I think) I asked for the cereal Crunchy Corn Bran. My bewildered parents went to the store, bought some, wrapped it and gave it to me. They couldn't understand why I wanted cereal for Christmas, and I couldn't figure out where they got it from. For years I've been telling Shannon about Crunch Corn Bran, and for years we've never seen it in any store. Apparently they still sell it in Sandy, but not in Provo or St. George. The cereal is kinda like Capt'n Crunch; it's little squares of crunchiness, but instead of being made primarily of sugar, it's made of corn bran. It looks bran-y, it tastes bran-y, and yet, somehow, it's good.
Well, at least I like it, and Shannon says she does to.
Saturday, January 10
Ender in Exile
Tuesday, January 6
Come
But we have a cunning plan. We get her attention, and then while she's watching, we start stacking things. Blocks, cups, anything. She can't resist it. She'll crawl all the way back across the room just to knock it over. I think you could start stacking paper and she'd come over to try to unstack them. She just can't stand to have one thing on top of another.
Unfortunately, today she crawled the 10 feet back to knock over my tower and then promptly turned right back around back for the garbage can. I can see we're going to be building a lot of towers to keep her distracted.
Monday, January 5
Books
"A Short History of Nearly Everything" by Bill Bryson. Bryson is a very entertaining writer, who is not a scientist. He finds science books boring, and set out to write a book about well, nearly everything thing that would be more interesting. And it is interesting. Of course, one of the ways he makes it more interesting is to add biographical bits that have nothing to do with his discussion of the developement of Big Bang theory, evolution, the age of the earth, and other science topics. It interesting, and while he adds in odd trivia, he still remains serious and accurate. There was one or two areas where I had a quibble with how some information was presented, but over all, I liked it very much.
"What do YOU care what other people think?" This is another Feynman book, and is the follow up to "Surely you must be joking Mr. Feynman," I guess. While "Surely you must be joking . . ." is full of short funny stories, "What do YOU care . . " is longer and somewhat more serious. The book is somewhat split into two main sections. The first is about his first wife. They met as teenagers, and by the time they married, they both knew she had a serious disease that would limit their time together. She died a few years later. The story is terrific. The second part of the book is about his involvement in the investigation of the Challenger space shuttle flight. This part is a bit slower and more detailed, but still interesting. Feynman was a very straight forward man, and wasn't afraid of anybody, and I love to see how such a "Curious Character" interacts with the world.
Sick Day
Shannon fared much better than me through the night, but now has taken ill, too. I'm personally blaming dinner last night.
So here I am at home, trying to keep my body running, watching the snow fall softly in sunny St. George. I'm not kidding about any of that, except for the bit about St. George being sunny. It's cold here, and it's snowing. Apparently we didn't move far enough south.
Our computer is now in the shop. By shop, I mean at KC's house, where he will hopefully fix it for us. Unfortunately, I don't always seem to have a lot of skills to offer people in return. But KC, if you ever need a trivial pursuit partner, I'll be there for you. (Unless we're playing against my sister, in which case, let's just give up. (Further, why are you playing trivial pursuit with my sister?))
Friday, January 2
Update
Upon arriving home, we found that our computer has self destructed. Not sure yet what is wrong with it. There is some sort of error to the effect of "unmountable boot disk" or something like that. I don't recall the exact phrasing right now. We'll be looking into it more soon, to be sure. I just figured I'd let people know why our blogging absence will continue on a bit longer.